Showing posts with label courage. Show all posts
Showing posts with label courage. Show all posts

Saturday, March 7, 2015

Spiritual Food 1503


I, Father Joseph, received this email, February 23, 2015, from a neocatecumen in a community that I help out from 2005 to 2015.


Dear Father Joe,
Do you think to carry forth your pastoral mission instead of continuing to spread these inaccuracies by way of Facebook and by way of email, and to pass so much time in the digital world….. you do not share our Way… you are free to do so … remember though how you helped us for years and this instrument, in the hands of the CHURCH, helped you for years … you are such an intelligent person that you are not able to see the good that this Way produces in the people and in the ordained persons and also in the church … I wish you a good pilgrimage of life, hoping to see you again soon …
Peace, David


- - - - - - -


The reply of Father Joseph Dwight:


Dear David,


Thank you for your email. I thank you also for your concern for me and for others.


But I am sorry that you do as so many others, to not want to consider another point of view in a true dialogue, with the true motive of seeking the truth together, with trust in our Holy Mother Church. Every morning for the Office of Readings, we pray the Invitatory Psalm which invites us to trust in God and it reminds us of all the benefits of God and to “listen to his voice! Harden not your hearts as at Meribah, as on that day at Massah in the desert…”! How easy it is to do as the Israelites, with harden hearts!


A great number of people in ecclesial movements are attached to feeling important or fulfilled or to be part of an important movement in the Church, and do not want to consider any other point of view or another explanation; they want to defend at all costs their group and their movement and their experience.


Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger said on May 27 1998: “… THERE IS MANIFESTED MANY DANGERS, as well as the ways of overcoming, in the (ecclesial) Movement. THERE IS THE THREAT OF UNILATERALITY which leads to exaggerating the specific mandate which has its origin in a given period or in strength of a particular charism … is a fact THAT CAN LEAD TO ABSOLUTIZING ones own movement, which ends up identifying itself with the Church herself, to understand itself as the way for all while in fact this one way can be made known in different ways.” (http://www.rns-italia.it/vademecum/Vademecum.htm).


THERE IS A STRONG TENDENCY FOR THE PEOPLE IN THE ECCLESIAL MOVEMENTS TO “ABSOLUTIZING ONES OWN MOVEMENT” especially today when we find ourselves more than ever in a social, cultural and spiritual crisis at all levels. But we priests must seek that maturity to not run from this lack of maturity which suffocates the life which is there, but to stand with Mary at the foot of the cross, waiting with patience and with our example, their Christian maturity. One makes a journey of faith and maturity together, each respecting the role and vocation of the other. (see also: http://www.vatican.va/holy_father/john_paul_ii/apost_exhortations/documents/hf_jp-ii_exh_30121988_christifideles-laici_en.html).
(Visit also in Italian: “Il Dio Infinito Fra Noi”; http://cibo-spir.blogspot.it/2014/01/il-dio-infinito-fra-noi.html).


Do we want to help each other reciprocally to seek what God wants in this situation, or do we only want to label (“digital world”) each other in order not to listen to one another so as not to consider what one says or writes, and to defend our position at all costs?


God can reveal the truth in the dense fog by way of people that God chooses, often with instruments who are small and humble and with less intelligence. “For I tell you, God is able from these stones to raise up children to Abraham” (Mt 3:9).


Why did you not have the courage to enter into what I had written, some phrase that I wrote, and to explain to me that a phrase that I wrote was not in harmony with a document of the Magisterium of the Church, instead of criticizing everything in a general way? This would be a mature way, a true act of love for me and for others! If one writes: “to pass so much time in the digital world”, is this not a general judgment, diversion to lead us further away from the fundamental discourse in order not to confront that which we do not want to confront in a dialogue (also by email) based on the documents of the Church? Or to write: “to carry forth your pastoral mission instead of continuing to spread these inaccuracies by way of Facebook and by way of email”. But do you have the courage to explain “these inaccuracies” not according to relativism of your head or of others around you, but according to the documents of the Magisterium of the Church, and the writings of the popes and of the saints? You were very concerned because I put my article on Facebook, but for you is the Truth important for you? What is more important, to defend the importance, the prestige of your group, or to defend and to follow the Truth which is crucified on the cross?


You, like so many others, do not want to consider the possibility of the seriousness of the situation, today in the Church and in the world, as well as the situation of the Neocatecumenal Way. After having written quite a bit in my two previous emails, I finished the second email with the phrase:
I AM TRULY CONVINCED that if Kiko, Carmen and Father Mario might have trusted in God, in the Magisterium of the Church, instead of themselves, they would have helped many in the Neocatecumenal Way to not gently slide into apostasy (2Thess 2:3-4) in this period of the “great tribulation” (Mt 24:21)!”


In an article, to which I made reference, one finds the seriousness of the situation according to Pope Benedict:
“ROME, April 11, 2012 – With a letter written personally to Cardinal William J. Levada, Benedict XVI has ordered the congregation for the doctrine of the faith to examine whether the Neocatechumenal Masses are or are not in keeping with the liturgical teaching and practice of the Catholic Church.”
A "PROBLEM," IN THE POPE'S JUDGMENT, THAT IS "OF GREAT URGENCY" FOR THE WHOLE CHURCH.”
“Benedict XVI has been ALARMED for some time about the particular ways in which the communities of the Neocatechumenal Way celebrate their Masses, on Saturday evening, in separate locations.”
“In reality, the danger feared by Benedict XVI and by many bishops – as demonstrated by the many complaints that have been made to the Vatican – is that the particular ways in which the Neocatechumenal communities all over the world celebrate their Masses may introduce into the Latin liturgy a new de facto "rite" artificially composed by the founders of the Way, foreign to the liturgical tradition, full of doctrinal ambiguities and a source of division in the community of the faithful.”


As I had included in my last email:
Also Pope John Paul II gave the same recall to the Neocatecumens:
“Celebrate the Eucharist and, above all, Easter, with true piety, with great dignity, with love for the liturgical rites of the Church, with exact observance of the established norms by the competent authority, with the will of communion with all the brothers…” (In Italian: Osservatore Romano, 11 febbraio 1983; http://www.geocities.ws/Athens/Delphi/6919/OR110283.htm).


According to you David, these two popes, John Paul II and Benedict, they are not very enlightened or not guided by the Holy Spirit or they have even made a mistake because they both said to the neocatecumens to observe the established norms, the liturgical books, with fidelity as is required of all the other Catholics in the whole world?


How easy it is for us to put this “great urgency”, this “alarm” of Pope Benedict into the category of an exaggeration of Pope Benedict or of others like Father Joe. Are we attached to something that we want and thus we are not willing to consider another point of view, even from the Vicar of Christ! Do we believe to be above the guidance of the Catholic Church? Do we use all of our intelligence in order to justify our position without taking the risk to have a true dialogue, seeking the truth without personal attachments, putting on the table the documents of the Magisterium of the Church, and the writings of the popes and of the saints? When we are attached to something that we do not want to loose, very often we ask questions not to learn something from someone who is not in agreement with us, but rather to put in place the other person according to our thought or idea, as did the Pharisees with Jesus with the questions (the snares). This is how so many lawyers do in order to defend their client at all costs, without seeking the truth, without considering the possibility that the client is not saying the truth. I met here in Italy one of the lawyers of the famous trial case in California more than twenty years ago, of O.J. Simpson. What a spectacle on American TV everyday for several months; what a mockery of justice!


Reading your email, I do not believe you are willing, like so many others, to consider the point of view of Pope John Paul II and Pope Benedict to “follow faithfully the liturgical books” for the whole Church, and even less, to obey the Magisterium of the Church. If the founders of the movement do not obey the Magisterium of the Church, the Neocatecumenal Way is not as you wrote: “this instrument, in the hands of the CHURCH” if the founders obey only that which they are in agreement with the Magisterium of the Church! I have a very strong impression, after having helped out the neocatechumens for ten years, that what Kiko says is much more important than what the Magisterium of the Church says for the great majority of the neocatecumens, just like their leader, Kiko!


The great majority of Catholics today see religion, the parish, the pastor, ecclesial movements, as something that might be useful for themselves, rather than something that might help them to discover the will of God and to help them to do the will of God! Thus they are looking in the wrong direction, they are not interested in a point of view that does not lead them to what they want! Without a fundamental change in direction, without a fundamental change in where they put their trust (in ourselves or in God), all the books and documents of the Church will not help people to realize that they are not living the “Our Father”: “Thy will be done”, not mine!


God said to Moses: “Behold, I will rain bread from heaven for you… that I may prove them, whether they will walk in my law or not. … I have heard the murmurings of the people of Israel…” (Ex 16:4,11). The people of Israel murmured even after God gave them bread from heaven, as so many Catholics do not respect the Body and Blood, Soul and Divinity of Jesus Christ in the Eucharist. After the resurrection of Jesus, God speaks by way of the Magisterium of the Church. There has been more murmurings against the Magisterium of the Church in the last 50 years (Humanae Vita, Memoriale Domini!) than ever before in the history of the Church. It is very interesting what Saint Francis of Assisi prophesied:
“2. The power of the demons will be greater than usual, the immaculate purity of our religious community and of others, will withered to the point that very few Christians will want to obey the true Sovereign Pontiff and the Roman Church with a sincere heart and perfect charity. At the decisive moment of this crisis, a personage not canonically elected, raised to the Pontificate, will endeavor to administer shrewdly to many the mortal poison of his error.” (http://spir-food.blogspot.it/2013/11/prophecy-st-francis.html).


I repeat the urgency, and the great danger:
I AM TRULY CONVINCED that if Kiko, Carmen and Father Mario might have trusted in God, in the Magisterium of the Church, instead of themselves, they would have helped many in the Neocatecumenal Way to not gently slide into apostasy (2Thess 2:3-4) in this period of the “great tribulation” (Mt 24:21)!”


Cardinal Ivan Dias often cited the phrase of Pope John Paul II: “We are standing before today the greatest fight that humanity has ever seen. I do not believe that the Christian community has totally understood this. We are today before the FINAL CONFRONTATION between the Church and the anti-Church, between the Gospel and the anti-Gospel” (http://www.lastampa.it/2007/12/13/blogs/san-pietro-e-dintorni/lotta-finale-all-anticristo-VjY7tBXJk6gNU3YmWcyOvN/pagina.html).


Strongly surrounded by the atmosphere of relativism today, it is easy to let our hearts to become attached to so many things, not only material, but also our importance before other creatures, and thus we have learned many ways to put aside the writings of the Magisterium of the Church and of the saints and of the popes, in order to justify: “Ignorance is bliss”!
Our Lady at Akita, Japan, said (October 13, 1973):
The work of the devil will infiltrate even the Church in such a way that one will see cardinals opposing cardinals, bishops against other bishops. … The Church will be full of those who accept compromise …” (http://www.miraclerosarymission.org/akita.htm).


I understand this “great urgency”, this “alarm” of Pope Benedict! This is why I also put my article on Facebook. With every member of the Neocatecumenal Way, going door to door for two years in their formation, the Neocatecumenal Way has grown quickly, precisely within the Church, but without obedience to the Church, to the Magisterium of the Church. The way of celebrating the Holy Mass is fundamental (“Lex orandi, lex credenda”!)! If one obeys the liturgical books of the Church, one maintains and one helps to grow the cult of God; if one does not obey the liturgical books of the Church, one slowly goes, in an imperceptible way, toward the cult of man, which is the fundamental strategy of the prince of the world, Satan!


David, you wrote: “you are such an intelligent person that you are not able to see the good that this Way produces in the people and in the ordained persons and also in the church”. And so according to you, Pope Benedict and Pope John Paul II are at least a little crazy and not balanced, as you believe to be, and do not see things in the right way? According to you, Satan is no longer able to “disguise himself as an angel of light”, or perhaps Satan converted?!? The masters of spirituality have always explained to us that this “angel of light always offers us at least 90% of the truth to destroy us, like a drop of poison in a nice glass of red wine; otherwise who would fall into his traps?!? Behold the importance of obedience to the Magisterium of the Church!


According to you David, the truth is established by the majority of the people in the group or by the Catholics or by God? And if you respond by God, how can one discover the truth? By the vote of the people, or by the polls, or …??? You as a Catholic, why did Jesus found a Church? Of what use is the Magisterium of the Church, according to you, or according to the great majority of the Catholics today? “Who do men say…?”
“Now when Jesus came into the district of Caesarea Philippi, he asked his disciples, "Who do men say that the Son of man is?" And they said, "Some say John the Baptist, others say Elijah, and others Jeremiah or one of the prophets." He said to them, "But who do you say that I am?" Simon Peter replied, "You are the Christ, the Son of the living God." And Jesus answered him, "Blessed are you, Simon Bar-Jona! For flesh and blood has not revealed this to you, but my Father who is in heaven. And I tell you, you are Peter, * and on this rock * I will build my church, and the powers of death * shall not prevail against it. I will give you the keys of the kingdom of heaven, and whatever you bind on earth shall be bound in heaven, and whatever you loose on earth shall be loosed in heaven”." (Mt 16:13-19).
The “men” had an opinion, but the first pope, Peter, did not offer an opinion. Why David do you believe more the opinions of the people in the community, or the other catechists, or even the founders of the Neocatecumenal Way, more than the Magisterium of the Church???


I come from the United States where there are more than 30,000 independent protestant groups who believe in the same Jesus Christ, the same God, but interpret the same Bible in different ways, often in contradictory ways. Do you believe David that Jesus did not know about this problem? Do you believe that Jesus who said to us that the “Truth shall set you free”, who said that “I am the Truth”, that Jesus did not offer the possibility for those of good will to discover and to live the Truth who is Jesus Christ? Behold the Magisterium of the Church!


David, after 15 years in the Way, you have heard many catechesis, you gave many catechesis, but after everything, for you, of what use is the Church, what is the Church? The documents are only a collection of opinions??? The Catechism of the Catholic Church for adults is only a summary of many opinions gathered together in 2000 years?!?


If the authority of the Church, as God intended, matters very little to you, that which I wrote matters even less to you. I can make many references to the documents of the Church, but we do not realize how far we have slid into the atmosphere of relativism which totally surrounds us today. Relativism is like acid rain, which destroys everything, and we do not realize how far we have slid into relativism without a lot of sincere prayer, in true humility, with the help of our Eucharistic Lord and Mary. You have your opinion and I have mine, and the Church has her opinion, and each pope has his opinion. We are all happy and full of exuberance! But if all is relative, then also relativism is relative, an inherent contradiction! There is no longer the absolute Truth; how nice, what freedom; we are free from the absolute Truth! And thus the documents are not important. God must change according to what the world wants in each epoch. Surrounded by this atmosphere of relativism, I understand why you think something is missing in the brain of Father Joe, a little stupid, or he has lost some balance in his closure in the “digital world”, because Father Joe makes references to the documents of the Church when the whole world today is totally into relativism and thus everything changes as we wish. G.K. Chesterton wrote: “We do not need a Church that is moved by the world, but a Church that moves the world.”
On “The World Over April 9, 2010: George Weigel & Frank Cottrell Boyce” (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1NUgaRrHj8k), George Weigel said: “Christianity, and specifically the Catholic Church, is the last obstacle still standing on the chess board to a sweep of the board by the forces of what Pope Benedict called the dictatorship of relativism. The marriage question is engaged here, life issues are engaged here. This is all of a piece…”


If a person does not do as the huge herd running in the world of relativism, toward the cult of man, then he is labels outside of the world, “not politically correct”. But God is outside of the world, and how can we discover the mentality of God when our criteria is based on what the majority of the people think, above all today in the most wicked generation in the history of the world? According to you David, all of the hermits are crazy because they detached themselves from the mentality of the world? How many times in history the world drifted far from God but some saint succeeded in escaping from the “wicked generation (Mt 17:17; Lk 9:41), precisely to save himself and that wicked generation?!? GOD IS NEEDED! Saint Anthony, Abbot, went into the desert; Saint Benedict went to Subiaco; Saint Francis went to Laverna! According to the mentality of the world, they are all crazy because they did not embrace the mentality of the world? After my decision to no longer celebrate a Mass not approved by the Magisterium of the Church, a few people telephoned me to ask me how I was. When I responded well, they asked me if that is the truth, with an attitude or even the hope that I was not doing ok, because how is this possible since I am detached from their special group!?! They must convince themselves that Father Joe is not well in order to justify not listening to what I want to say and their way of doing things. The cult of man! Is not my desert, my Subiaco, my Laverna, my Mount Tabor, an hour everyday before the infinite God in the Tabernacle, one hour beyond the time of the Holy Mass and of the Liturgy of the Hours? The saints passed as much time as possible before the infinite God in the Tabernacle! If God is not before the neighbor, the love that we believe to have for the neighbor is totally human love, nothing divine!


It seems to me that to have lived in two cultures, with two languages, helps a lot to open ones mental horizons, to be able to see the culture of origin from another point of view and to be able to see another culture from the point of view of the first culture. So many insecure people do not listen to another point of view but rather criticize, and even condemn, those who do not think like they do! When we have an experience of only one ecclesial movement there is the great tendency and danger of “absolutizing ones own moment” and to judge everything from one point of view! Archbishop Fulton Sheen, commenting on the Magi and the pastors at the birth of Our Lord, said that the Magi read many books and thus understood that they did not know everything; the people who have read only one book believe to know everything!


Are the saints who left the world all crazy and full of pride according to you, David, because they did not follow the mentality of the world, the herd that stampedes with the cult of man, because they entered into another type of “digital world”, and then they were criticized and condemned by the world? My aunt, Mother Agnes of Divine Love, a cloistered nun, Carmelite, was not prudent or wise according to the people of the world? The world says that these nuns do not concretely contribute something to the world, and thus they have wasted their lives, which are not worth anything! But to the contrary, the Church says that the life of prayer and penance and sacrifice, like the Carmelite nuns, is the higher vocation! But all the saints had in common humility and obedience to the Magisterium of the Church, not to themselves and neither to a group that does not obey the Magisterium of the Church!!!


Behold “What the devil dislikes”:
F) “I am very vexed by those little servants with the head covered who abandon all and everything in order to close themselves within four walls, in order to sacrifice all that is beautiful and good for that God that only I have succeeded in defeating… Day and night they mortify themselves with night prayers and reckless and insubstantial fasting, they do not sleep sufficiently, they do not eat according to the needs of the appetite and of the body which demands the necessary diet, they do not speak freely anywhere and always… taciturn… sulky looking… full of sadness, the most inhuman… they pray, they sing and all this sacrifice they do for who? For what particular motive, for what ends, for what results? Fortunately the vast majority are not very intelligent… dull witted… lacking in willpower who let themselves be dragged in by some dissatisfied priests… poor sissies who do not know the true pleasure of sex with all of its relative pleasures…! Poor little servants, who have never felt the sensations of the flesh, by way of intercourse and by the kisses of my men…! And yet how many of them I cause to fall, I reduce them to a wretched life, sterile, deprived of all fervor, throwing them into the greatest lukewarmness… Yes, I butcher them… because above all I fear the cloistered ones… I fear greatly…! They are my most terrible and well-trained enemies, they rip from my hands so many souls of every sex, of every class and condition… What terrible enemies… when they begin to pray for the conversion of a soul to snatch from me, they no longer stop, no longer… no longer… they are tenacious and obstinate! And then if it is not enough the long and exhausting prayers to their false crucified God, who they shamelessly call their SPOUSE, they then begin with the arduous penances of every type… what enemies… what storm troopers! I have tried many times to diminish the vocations to this stupid life… but unfortunately I have not yet succeeded… there are still too many stupid little and foolish women, even though many times they have college degrees… What enemies…!” (“Likes and Dislikes of the Devil”; http://spir-food.blogspot.it/2014/01/likes-and-dislikes-of-devil.html).


I realize that my two previous emails that I already sent are worth very little for the great majority of people in the Catholic Church and in the Neocatecumenal Way, and among a great number of priests and bishops today who no longer obey the Magisterium of the Church. Because by now, totally surrounded by the atmosphere of relativism, like the air we breath, the documents of the Magisterium of the Church do not count for much at all! What then is our criteria of discernment, if not the Magisterium of the Church?!? If we put aside the law of God explained in its fullness in the documents of the Church, who wins the argument or establishes the law of the land? The strongest one!?! Behold the “dictatorship of relativism”, as Pope Benedict told us!


The devil leads us to look at the exterior things only, which become a distraction, a diversion, so as not to look at the interior content, to not look at everything from the point of view of the Creator of the universe. Thus one does not consider what the person is trying to say, but one looks at how the person is not like the others, he is not normal (like all the prophets!), he must have a problem, he has made mistakes in the past, so it is not taken into consideration what the person is trying to say. But normally God chooses the most ill-fated to do His work for two reasons: 1) only God could have done this with such a miserable instrument, 2) God works only in the humble because the humble trust in God, they make room inside of themselves for God instead of for themselves, and thus they become instruments of God and not of themselves!


“Cursed is the man who trusts in man… Blessed is the man who trusts in the Lord” (Jer 17:5,7)!


The devil plays the same game of distractions, of diversion regarding the Church, disseminating slander and lies; he shows us only the sinners in the Church and in the history of the Church – the scandals of some priests, the false presentation of the crusades – so that the people do not arrive at the content, that is, God has given us a guide, a Church made up of sinners, not by perfect angels from heaven, as the critics believe to be! One of the fundamental trials for each one of us is to seek out and find the pearl of great price (Mt 13:46), the “hidden treasure” (Mt 13:44) inside the Church, not withstanding all the filth around that pearl, that treasure, that diamond inside the box often covered with the excrements of the sinners and of the scandals! The protestants and the sects believe to be better, more perfect, and thus have refused the true Church and have lost the fullness of the means of sanctification, the sacraments and especially the Eucharist, and the fullness of the truth with the guidance of the Magisterium of the Church (Lumen Gentium 8) made up of fragile and weak men. One of the strongest proofs that the Catholic Church is the true Church is precisely this, that notwithstanding all the negative things outside and inside the Church, she is still here on the earth after 2000 years, with the Truth that does not change! How else could Jesus assure us that “the Truth shall set you free” (Jn 8:32), or “I am the Truth” (Jn 14:6)?!? It is very important to study the true history! Only God could do this miracle. When Napoleon said to a cardinal that he will destroy the Church, the cardinal responded: “If we bishops have not succeeded in destroying the Church in 1900 years, how do you think you can do it?” The Mass is valid even if the priest is a great sinner and in the state of mortal sin. But the people, again, look at the exterior, and many do not go to the Mass of that priest, even though in that Mass the bread and wine become the Body and the Blood of Jesus Christ, while the poor priest, not repentant, commits a personal sacrilege! When Saint Francis met a scandalous priest, he did not reprimand that priest as the people expected, but he knelt down before that poor priest, kissed his hands, and said to the people around him that from these hands I receive my Lord in the Eucharist and the pardon of my sins”! After this, that poor priest sent away the women in his house and converted with much penance.


Seventy years ago, many Catholics trusted the Church without explanation. Now we must, with great effort, rediscover that God gave us only one Church to guide us in the “dour combat” (CCC 409) of life, in this “valley of tears”, in this “cold and dense fog” in the Catholic Church, provoked by the father of lies (Jn 8:44) who sows many deceptions and lies continuously, as an “angel of light” (2Cor 11:14). The Israelites abandoned God many times, and every once in a while they surrendered to the man of God that God had given them, that is, the judges and the prophets. In the book of Judges alone, the Israelites went through this cycle of abandoning and returning to God seven times!


Our Lady revealed to Father Stefano Gobbi (02-09-1985): “Darkness, with A THICK, COLD FOG, has entered the Church, obscuring it in the splendor of its truth. For this reason, every day, my word is forming you to the spirit of wisdom, that you may always see, in the light, the truth which my Son has taught you and proclaim it with courage to all in its integrity.”


“From some crevice, the smoke of Satan has entered the temple of God” (Pope Paul VI; June 29, 1972; http://www.vatican.va/holy_father/paul_vi/homilies/1972/documents/hf_p-vi_hom_19720629_it.html).


Certainly there are the sects. But according to the world today, totally immersed into relativism, almost all of the saints had the sectarian mentality, because their gaze was totally and continuously turned to God. Look at how many saints left the world to find God! How many people, according to their personal vocation, do not have this courage because human respect is so important to them. “If any one comes to me and does not hate his own father and mother and wife and children and brothers and sisters, yes, and even his own life, he cannot be my disciple” (Lk 14:26). Jesus is very demanding, more than any other founder of a religion because Jesus is God and can offer heaven! The world believes that Jesus is truly crazy, a fundamentalist, according to the mentality today.


In a certain sense it is a miracle to get to paradise, because it is necessary to detach oneself from the mentality of the world (Jn 17:6; Rm 12:2) which means to not go along with the vast majority. There is always the temptation to judge others who do not believe as we do. But Jesus is radical! There is no doubt! According to the world all of the true Christians are in a cult because Jesus asks for everything, even to loose our friends and relatives. And even to be despised as a egotist and crazy person by the people who surround us. We are truly in the times when the true followers of Christ will be killed in the name of God. “Indeed, the hour is coming when whoever kills you will think he is offering service to God” (Jn 16:2; Mt 24:9)!


“6. Those who preserve their fervor and adhere to virtue with love and ZEAL FOR THE TRUTH, will suffer injuries and, persecutions as rebels and schismatics; for their persecutors, urged on by the evil spirits, will say they are rendering a great service to God by destroying such pestilent men from the face of the earth. But the Lord will be the refuge of the afflicted, and will save all who trust in Him. And in order to be like their Head, [Christ] these, the elect, will act with confidence, and by their death will purchase for themselves eternal life; choosing to obey God rather than man, they will fear nothing, and they will prefer to perish rather than consent to falsehood and perfidy.” (“The “Prophecy” of Saint Francis (Assisi)”; http://spir-food.blogspot.it/2013/11/prophecy-st-francis.html).


And so, if it is difficult to distinguish between people who are in the cults not of God and those who truly follow Jesus totally even to the point of despising the world and even their life, who can help us to distinguish the difference, the right path? The opinion of the majority of the people? If we throw out the guidance of the Magisterium of the Church, what do you offer me David to help me to discern, to distinguish between good and evil? Your opinion? The descision of a founder of a movement? What does 2000 years of history tell us when there were moments and situations similar to what we see today in the Church?


The devil has worked hard to undermine authority, non only that of the Church but also of parents, so that children follow the mentality of the world, not of the parents. But who is the prince of the world (Jn 12:31; 14:30)? If the devil has led us to not care about the documents of the Church nor the Catechism of the Catholic Church for adults, we will be formed by who, by which group? In the end there is only heaven or hell for all eternity! In heaven there is the Truth (Jn 14:6); in hell there is “the father of lies” (Jn 8:44)!


DAVID, HOW CAN WE DISCERN IN THIS SITUATION, THE NEOCATECUMENAL MASS? Behold the fundamental question! What are the fundamental guide posts? Have we slowly embraced the agenda of Freemasonry to throw out the absolute Truth so that the Freemasonry can form our brains, and to lead us where their head, Satan, decides? If we do not have the anchor of the Church, the guidance of the Church which explains to us the Truth of God which does not change, then where are we going, how do we decide things, how can we discern good or evil, for our true good, and for the good of our children and of the society? Without this anchor in the great storm on the sea of life, this “dour combat” (CCC 409), where is our little boat of our life going, or the boat of our community, or the boat of an ecclesial movement? Is there a better anchor than the Magisterium of the Church, David? The Church is not the Author of Truth but the handmaid of Truth!


David, are you trying to discover together what Jesus wants, or what you want, and therefore you do not want to have an open and sincere dialogue with the risk of discovering something that you do not want? I am not saying that I have all the answers in my pocket, and neither are you saying this. But I am saying “dialogue” as Pope John Paul II encouraged us many times to do. A sincere dialogue is to not ask questions to put in line the other person according to our head and without reference to the documents of the Magisterium of the Church, but rather to allow each one to offer his thoughts based on documents and on reality, not according to relativism, of which Pope Benedict said that it is "the most profound difficulty of our time”.


In his homily at the Mass preceding the conclave that quickly elected him Pope Benedict XVI, then Cardinal Ratzinger said: “Today, having a clear faith based on the Creed of the Church IS OFTEN LABELED AS FUNDAMENTALISM. Whereas relativism, that is, letting oneself be "tossed here and there, carried about by every wind of doctrine", seems the only attitude that can cope with modern times. We are building a dictatorship of relativism that does not recognize anything as definitive and whose ultimate goal consists solely of one's own ego and desires.” (http://www.vatican.va/gpII/documents/homily-pro-eligendo-pontifice_20050418_en.html; http://www.ignatiusinsight.com/features2005/colson_relativism_may05.asp).


To some parishioners who grumble because I do not preach or bless a Christianity without the cross of which they are used to, I say: “If I preach according to my head and not according to the Catechism of the Catholic Church for adults, I, Father Joe, will go to hell, and I will not go to hell for anyone!” Today, more than ever, there are a great number of priests who do not preach according to the Catechism of the Catholic Church for adults and they risk going very deeply into hell, and they lead with them many souls, all those who believed and lived their easier and more comfortable lies. This is exactly what Our Lady had Saint Michael the Archangel communicate at Garabandal, Spain, in 1965, precisely when there was a great rebellion at all levels of the Church against Humanae Vitae! The family is the fundamental cell of society and from which every human person has his origins. Behold the fundamental attack of our enemy, who wants to destroy us! If one parent encourages the children to follow Christ’s commandments with the cross, and the other parent says that this is not necessary because God loves you, who will the children follow? The easier way! If one priest in a zone of 10 priests preaches the whole Gospel, without remaining silent about the more difficult parts of the Gospel explained by the Magisterium of the Church, which priest will the people follow, and which priest will the people criticize?


A great number of people are on broad road, “covered with sand and flowers, full of joy, music and all sorts of pleasures. People walked along it, dancing and enjoying themselves. They reached the end without realizing it. And at the end of the road there was a horrible precipice; that is, the abyss of hell. The souls fell blindly into it; as they walked, so they fell. And their number was so great that it was impossible to count them. And I saw the other road, or rather, a path, for it was narrow and strewn with thorns and rocks; and the people who walked along it had tears in their eyes, and all kinds of suffering befell them. Some fell down upon the rocks, but stood up immediately and went on. At the end of the road there was a magnificent garden filled with all sorts of happiness, and all these souls entered there. At the very first instant they forgot all their sufferings” (Diary of Saint Faustina, no. 153). “Today, I was led by an Angel to the chasms of hell… But I noticed one thing: that most of THE SOULS THERE ARE THOSE WHO DISBELIEVED THAT THERE IS A HELL” (Diary, 741) (http://www.saint-faustina.com/Diary/DMIMS1.shtml).


Ignorance is bliss”! But if one does like this one does not unmask the “angel of light” (2Cor 11:14), one does not go toward true liberty, because the uncomfortable truth sets us free, not the truth according to our heads of relativism, or according to the world, that is, according to the prince of this world, Satan (Jn 12:31; 14:30)!


Take courage David, seek the uncomfortable truth by way of dialogue even with those who are not in agreement with you!


Do we want reality and the truth as we want it, or do we confront reality as the reality is, and as the truth is, as do mature adults?!? Unfortunately, the devil has ferociously attacked, in a very underhanded and sly way, the fathers of the families, the priests and the bishops, to lead them to not live their vocation from God, as men, to not be ready to offer the uncomfortable truth on the cross, to not be ready to sacrifice themselves for their wives, for their families, for their parishes, for their dioceses, for the society and for the whole world. And thus many youth and adults today did not have a father or a pastor as an evangelical model, like Jesus, in order to assimilate and to imitate this male model of God in the period of formation especially as a child up to 12 years of age, when the child is fundamentally formed. The television today presents males as misfits, wimps, and cowards, and it strongly pushes us to be “politically correct”, but not correct according to Divine Revelation, not according to a true man of God! Today there is greatly lacking personal discipline to be able to seek and to do and to proclaim the crucified Truth, and to be ready to remain alone on the cross with Jesus abandoned, or at the foot of the cross with Mary desolate, for the true good of others, for the redemption of the world!


Dear David, for your own good I write these things. How many children, today more than ever, did not have a father who loved his children enough to discipline his children? It was recounted on EWTN (TV) that a man in prison for more than 20 years said that his Dad did not love him because his Dad never gave him discipline as a true father, who loves his children (Heb 12:6; Prov 3:12). Children often rebel at discipline from Dad, but children do not respect a Dad who does not discipline his children.


The Servant of God, Archbishop Fulton Sheen used to say: “The truth is the truth even if no one believes it; error is error even if everyone believes it”! The films 60 years ago often gave us this evangelical model of a man, for example, the sheriff in the film: “High Noon” (1952)! Many fake being true males but only up to the point that they do not have to loose something to which they have let their hearts become attached to, especially, the glory before people, slowly sliding into blindness with each compromise in order to defend these attachments. The most true Man was totally humiliated on the cross 2000 years ago; this is the model of the authentic man which today the world, which surrounds us and influences us, does not at all understand, as so many Catholics today! Also how many wives have not put God, the Truth, before her husband or her mother or any other person or thing (Mt 10:37; Lk 14:26)?


The reality today is so overwhelming that without God it is impossible to confront the reality and the truth as it is! Behold the fundamental necessity of humility before the Eucharist with the help of Mary, because without humility, God does not help us, He goes away from us! Jesus said to Saint Faustina: “The greatest misery does not stop Me from uniting Myself to a soul, but where there is pride, I am not there” (Diary, no. 1563). But with God, all is possible (Mt 19:26), even to act as men of God, even if we have not received this formation from our Dad as children.


Dear David, life is tough! It is tough for everyone today because so many Catholics did not pray in the last decades and we have arrived to this point, the period of the “great tribulation” (Mt 24:21)!


But as other saints tell us for these our times, Sister Lucy of Fatima said to Father Agostino Fuentes, the postulator of the cause of beatification of Giacinta e Francesco (December 26, 1957): “Father, it is urgent that we realize this terrible reality. We do not want to fill the souls with fear, but only it is urgent a recall to reality. From when the Holy Virgin gave such a great efficaciousness to the Rosary, there does not exist any material, spiritual, national or international problem that cannot be resolved with THE HOLY ROSARY AND WITH OUR SACRIFICES. To recite it with devotion will be to consol Mary and to wipe away so many tears from her Immaculate Heart. … Our Lady expressly said: “We are approaching the end times”.”


SAINT PADRE PIO said: "It would be easier for the world to survive without the sun than to do so without the HOLY MASS." This saint also said: “The ROSARY is the weapon for these times”!


Saint Louis de Montfort, in his book “True Devotion to Mary” (no. 47), wrote:
“I said that this will happen especially towards the end of the world, and indeed soon, because Almighty God and his holy Mother are to raise up great saints who will surpass in holiness most other saints as much as the cedars of Lebanon tower above little shrubs. This has been revealed to a holy soul whose life has been written by M. de Renty.”


So David, take courage. Spend as much time as possible on your knees before the infinite God in the tabernacle with the Rosary, and “there does not exist any material, spiritual, national or international problem that cannot be resolved”!


Rest assured of my prayers and sacrifices for you.


Don Jo (Joseph) Dwight


- - - - - - -


An Experience of Life:


During my years of university I committed some crimes. For this I was tried and convicted. Now I am serving my sentence. A few Christians came to visit us in jail. I was impressed by the way they talked about the Gospel . Above all they stated that the Gospel can be " put into practice". They used this expression. "Putting it into practice"? I never thought that the Gospel could be even outside the churches. One of them quoted a sentence: "Love your neighbor as yourself." "Like myself," I repeated to myself almost like a mantra. The thought hammered into me that I – really I - could begin to love. To love? I do not know how to do that. I'm not used to showing affection, not even to my parents, to my family, to my friends . And then "who" to love?


I looked up, in front of me was my cellmate. Shortly after arrived the meal. He was hungrier than me. Had I been in his shoes, I would have liked to eat more. I shared with him my ration. Then I realized: my stomach was more empty, but my heart was much fuller than before! Perhaps this is what “to love” means?


- - - - - - -


You can find all three of the last “Spiritual Food”, regarding “THE NEOCATECUMENAL MASS” at:






Wednesday, January 21, 2015

Spiritual Food 1501


Jesus said to her, ‘Give me to drink’ (Jn 4:7).


Are we also ready to respond as the sons of Zebedee responded when Jesus asked them: “Are you able to drink the cup that I am to drink?” (Mt 20:22)?

We have been duped, manipulated and brainwashed with the greatest sophistication of mental manipulation in the history of the world. Thus many are ignorant and innocent of what they have been led into. But when they are confronted with at least one person who succeeded in pulling himself/herself out of the very strong current, a person who left the stampeding herd, toward the cult of man instead of the cult of God, toward the beautiful but empty lies of “the father of lies” (Jn 8:44), instead of going toward “the way, and the truth, and the life” (Jn 14:6), they are then before a fundamental choice, to seek the Truth outside of their own heads, or to take the much easier way of continuing what they have slid into which is what just about everyone around them is doing, to be “politically correct”, which does not lead to the absolute and saving Truth Who is Jesus Christ. Many also have let their hearts become attached to certain things not of God, including glory before men especially in the Church, and have push aside the inspirations and graces of God with many small compromises which are always accompanied by more and more blindness to the real situation from God’s perfect point of view.

It is interesting that years ago there was a psychological study done in which a high school teacher told everyone to raise their right hand, but in the classroom of 30 students there were 29 who were told beforehand to raise their left hand. The one who did not know about this began to raise his right hand but when they saw the 29 who raised their left hand, decided to raise his left hand. Then one of the 29 put his hand down and raised his right hand. When the one alone saw this, he decided to raise his right hand also. After many similar tests, the results were very conclusive that when just one person has the courage to follow what is right, it gives great courage for others who have been intimidated by the mass mob stampeding away from the uncomfortable, but saving Truth which is accompanied by the cross of Christ.

Somehow I believe that God has given me the grace during my life to seek the inconvenient Truth outside of my head and to be willing to take the risk to stand up even when I was very often totally alone in what I had discovered and what I had to do. I received a lot of this part of my character from my Dad, but when I realized that my Dad had slid down the wrong direction, God gave me the grace to follow the Truth even though I suffered greatly by being rejected by my parents. Visit: http://necedah-cult.blogspot.com; http://spir-food.blogspot.it/2012/12/the-death-of-my-brother.html.

I have been in the Church all my life and thus needless to say I have suffered the most from my spouse, the Church. I have been betrayed and abandoned by priests, loosing my community or parish or friends; twice I suffered a difficult depression after such experiences. These experiences offered me many opportunities to struggle for the Truth which gives true freedom. Visit:The Great Responsibility Of Religious Leaders” (http://josephdwight.wordpress.com/2014/08/07/great-responsibility/).

Each time we suffer in these difficult situations, and we persevere in praying and not abandoning God after His pruning (Jn 15:2; Prov 3:12; Heb 12:5-6), our hearts are enlarged and we are more and more free of ourselves and of our hidden egoisms so as to have more room in our hearts for God and His graces. This is the experience of all of the saints.

Very recently (a few days ago) I realized that God was asking me to make another painful cut in my life. This is also the reason why this edition of my “Spiritual Food” is a little late this month. To describe this well for you, I will now offer you the email that I sent, only a few days ago, to over 100 members of the Neocatecumenal Way here in Italy.

- - -

The following is the email I sent to over 100 members of the Neocatecumenal Way here in Italy on January 19, 2015:


Dear brothers and sisters of the Neocatecumenal communities,

I have been helping out with the Holy Masses and the Penitential celebrations with you for almost 10 years. I had mentioned to you a few times that I knew that your statutes had been approved a few years ago, but the way in which you celebrated the Holy Mass was not yet approved and that Pope Benedict had formed a commission to examine the Holy Mass celebrated in the small groups Saturday evening among the members of the Neocatecumenal Way. I believed up to only a few days ago that this commission had not finished their work before Pope Benedict had left the papacy. A few days ago I discovered that instead the commission had finished their work and the three founders of the Neocatecumenal Way - Kiko ArgĂ¼ello, Carmen Hernandez and Father Mario Pezzi – had received a letter on December 1, 2005 written by Cardinal Arinze, the prefect of the Vatican Congregation for the Liturgy with a list of “decisions of the Holy Father” to which they were to obey.

I discovered that Kiko ArgĂ¼ello, Carmen Hernandez e Father Mario Pezzi did not obey the letter sent by Cardinal Francis Arinze. I was about to offer my decision that I must obey the “decisions of the Holy Father” Saturday evening at the Masses I celebrated for two groups, January 17, 2015, when a catechist, for more than 20 years, told me that after the letter of Arinze, the Neocatecumenal Mass was approved by Pope Benedict. And so I did not offer my decision in my printed letter Saturday evening (attached).

When I tried to find this approbation of the Holy Father on the Internet, I discovered that what had happened was that the pontifical council for the laity headed by Cardinal Stanislaw Rylko had prepared the text for a degree of blanket approval of all the liturgical and extra-liturgical celebrations of the Neocatechumenal Way, to be made public January 20, 2012 on the occasion of a meeting scheduled between the Pope and the Way. The decree was redacted according to the guidelines of the congregation for divine worship, headed by Cardinal Antonio Cañizares Llovera. The founders and leaders of the Way, Francisco "Kiko" ArgĂ¼ello and Carmen HernĂ¡ndez, were told about it and joyfully told their followers about the imminent approval. All unbeknownst to the Pope.

Benedict XVI found out about the text of the decree a few days before the meeting on January 20. He found it illogical and mistaken. He ordered that it be scrapped and rewritten according to his guidelines.

In the “Address of His Holiness Benedict XVI to the Community of the Neocatechumenal Way”, January 20, 2012, Pope Benedict gave a genuine lecture – almost an ultimatum – that the celebrations in the small communities must be “regulated by the liturgical books that must be faithfully followed”, as he had ordered already in the letter of Cardinal Arinze more than 6 years earlier.

Thus, I ask you to read my decision in my letter (attached) which I had intended to give last Saturday, January 17, 2015, but instead I offer now after having discovered that the neocatecumenal Mass had not been approved. Toward the end of this letter I offered “a proposal, my idea”.

Dear brothers and sisters, “The Truth will make you free!” (Jn 8:32), non only in this short life, but for all eternity!

Father Joseph Dwight

- - -

The following is the printed letter that I had planned to give out Saturday evening at two neocatecumenal Masses, January 17, 2015:


January 17, 2015

Dear brothers and sisters of the Neocatecumenal communities,

I have been helping out with the Holy Masses and the Penitential celebrations with you for almost 10 years. I see a lot of good will and good fruits. Precisely for this reason I offered myself even to the point of offering two Holy Masses every Saturday evening with you, and the Penitential celebrations whenever you called me.

I had mentioned to you a few times that I knew that your statutes had been approved a few years ago, but the way in which you celebrated the Holy Mass was not yet approved and that Pope Benedict had formed a commission to examine the Holy Mass celebrated in the small groups Saturday evening among the members of the Neocatecumenal Way. I believed up to only a few days ago that this commission had not yet finished their work before Pope Benedict had left the papacy. A few days ago I discovered that instead the commission had finished their work and the three founders of the Neocatecumenal Way - Kiko ArgĂ¼ello, Carmen Hernandez and Father Mario Pezzi – had received a letter on December 1, 2005 written by Cardinal Arinze, the prefect of the Vatican Congregation for the liturgy with a list of “decisions of the Holy Father” to which they were to obey.

“Of the six points detailing the pope’s directives, only one permits the Neocatechumenals to continue what they are doing. This regards placing the exchange of peace before the offertory, a traditional practice in the Christian liturgy which is still in use today, for example, in the Ambrosian Rite celebrated in the archdiocese of Milan. All the other points require the Neocatechumenal Way to eliminate a large portion of its liturgical innovations.”

Our Holy Mother Church seeks to help and protect the ecclesial movements in order not to loose the gifts that the Holy Spirit has given to each movement. Being part of the Focolare Movement since 1986, many times I heard from the mouth of Chiara Lubich that she followed immediately and totally every small indication from Pope John Paul II, even if she had to change her important programs. Like the saints and good religious, Chiara Lubich trusted totally in God, not in herself, and thus she believed that if she obeyed the Pope, her superior, after she expressed well her thoughts, even if she was not in agreement with the decision of the Pope, she did the holy will of God. If the Pope truly made a mistake, according to God, the Pope will most likely change his idea, precisely because Chiara Lubich obeyed. Humility and obedience cause the graces of God to gush forth! If what Chiara Lubich believed was right was truly right according to God, God will take care of the problem, and to change the idea of her superior, in God’s own time. The first criteria of discernment regarding private revelations is precisely humility and obedience (Visit: “The Catholic Church and Private Revelation”; http://priv-rev.blogspot.com). Certainly, the responsibility of superiors is great! Visit: “The Great Responsibility of Religious Leaders” (http://josephdwight.wordpress.com/2014/08/07/great-responsibility/).

At the beginning of a movement the Church offers a period of observation as well as certain verbal authorizations, as Pope John Paul did with the leaders of the Neocatechumenal Way. Then afterwards Mother Church guides us for our true good and for the true good of the ecclesial movement. It is similar to Jesus Who received all, did many miracles and healings, but slowly led all those, who were willing, with Him toward Jerusalem, toward Calvary, and finally to the crucifixion where there was only the Mother of Jesus, Saint John the apostle and some women. Jesus leads all those of good will toward Calvary with the cross, toward trust in God not in themselves, which is the only way to overcome our egoisms in order to love God and neighbor in an authentic way. “The Truth will make you free!” (Jn 8:32).

The recall of Benedict XVI regards the ways in which the neocatecumenal groups celebrate the Mass. The Pope wants them to conform to what is prescribed in the liturgical norms valid for the whole Church.

I was surprised when I discovered that Kiko ArgĂ¼ello, Carmen Hernandez e Father Mario Pezzi did not obey the letter in which were articulated the directives of the Pope. Their act of partial obedience is in a letter which they wrote to the Pope on January 17, 2006. They limit themselves in fact to thank the Pope for having conceded to them another two years of time. And they return to defend their way of doing the communion. They underline that to do the communion “in this way” is an essential instrument to convert the ones further away from the faith: to abandon this would compromise their mission. On this crucial point of the communion they indicated that they want to follow their way. It is in fact the diffuse opinion among the neocatecumenals that the letter of Arinze was something provisionary, modifiable, a simple “instrumentum laboris”, and that in the end their practice will be substantially approved. This opinion persists even after the recall of Benedict XVI regarding the rite of the Mass, in his talk given to the neocatecumenals on January 12 2006.

In any case, this is not the thought neither of Arinze nor of the Pope. In an interview on February 15, 2006, on Vatican Radio, the cardinal prefect for the congregation for the liturgy reasserted that the letter is “the conclusion to everything”. In this way he explained the process from which the letter originated:

“The letter flowed out of what emerged from the examination of this congregation of how the Neocatecumenal Way celebrates the Holy Mass for many years. … To exam this we had a mixed commission among people nominated from the Neocatecumenal Way and people nominated by our congregation. In the discussions emerged many practices which they do during the Mass, … and many emerged which were not according to the approved books. This is the background. Everything was examined in many sessions by the mixed commission during a period of two years or more. And there was also a discussion among seven cardinals of the Roman curia, desired by the Holy Father, who examined everything. Thus, this letter is the conclusion to everything”.

BEHOLD THE LETTER WRITTEN BY CARDINAL ARINZA:

"I am to inform you of the Holy Father’s decisions..."

Congregatio de Cultu Divino et Disciplina Sacramentorum
Prot. 2520/03/L
From Vatican City, December 1, 2005

To the esteemed Mr. Kiko ArgĂ¼ello, Ms. Carmen Hernandez, and Rev. Father Mario Pezzi,

Following the conversations with this Congregation for Divine Worship and the Discipline of the Sacraments on the celebration of the Most Holy Eucharist in the communities of the Neocatechumenal Way, in keeping with the guidelines issued in the meeting with you on November 11 of this year, I am to inform you of the Holy Father’s decisions.

In the celebration of the Holy Mass, the Neocatechumenal Way shall accept and follow the liturgical books approved by the Church, without omitting or adding anything. Furthermore, in regard to some elements the guidelines and clarifications are emphasized as follows:

1. Sunday is the “Dies Domini” as the Servant of God Pope John Paul II wished to illustrate in the Apostolic Letter on the Lord’s Day. Therefore the Neocatechumenal Way must enter into dialogue with the diocesan bishop in order to make it clear that the community of the Neocatechumenal Way is incorporated into the parish even in the context of the liturgical celebrations. At least one Sunday per month, the communities of the Neocatechumenal Way must participate in the Holy Mass of the parish community.

2. As for any admonitions issued before the readings, these must be brief. Adherence must also be shown to what is set out in the “Institutio Generalis Missalis Romani” (nn. 105 and 128) and to the Praenotanda of the “Ordo Lectionum Missae” (nn. 15, 19, 38, 42).

3. The homily, because of its nature and importance, is reserved to the priest or deacon (cf. Codex Iuris Canonici, can. 767 § 1). As for the occasional contribution of testimonies on the part of the lay faithful, the proper places and methods for these are indicated in the Interdicasterial Instruction “Ecclesiae de Mysterio,” which was approved “in specific form” by Pope John Paul II and published on August 15, 1997. In this document, sections 2 and 3 of article 3 read as follows:

§2 - “It is permitted to have a brief instruction that helps explain better the liturgy that is being celebrated, and even, in exceptional circumstances, a few testimonies, as long as these conform to the liturgical norms, are offered on the occasion of Eucharistic liturgies celebrated on particular days (for seminarians, the sick, etc.), and are thought truly helpful as an illustration of the regular homily delivered by the celebrating priest. These instructions and testimonies must not assume characteristics that might cause them to be confused with the homily.”

§3 - “The possibility of ‘dialogue’ during the homily (cf. Directorium de Missis cum Pueris, no. 48) can be used occasionally and with prudence by the celebrating minister as a means of exposition, which does not transfer to others the duty of preaching.”

Careful attention must also be paid to the Instruction “Redemptionis Sacramentum,” no. 74.

4. On the exchange of peace, permission is granted to the Neocatechumenal Way to continue using the indult already granted, pending further instructions.

5. On the manner of receiving Holy Communion, a period of transition (not exceeding two years) is granted to the Neocatechumenal Way to pass from the widespread manner of receiving Holy Communion in its communities (seated, with a cloth-covered table placed at the center of the church instead of the dedicated altar in the sanctuary) to the normal way in which the entire Church receives Holy Communion. This means that the Neocatechumenal Way must begin to adopt the manner of distributing the Body and Blood of Christ that is provided in the liturgical books.

6. The Neocatechumenal Way must also make use of the other Eucharistic Prayers contained in the missal, and not only Eucharistic Prayer II.

In short, the Neocatechumenal Way, in its celebration of the Holy Mass, should follow the approved liturgical books, keeping in mind what is laid out above under the numbers 1,2,3,4,5, and 6.

Acknowledging the favors that the Lord has bestowed upon the Church through the many activities of the Neocatechumenal Way, I take this occasion to extend to you my best regards.

+ Francis Card. Arinze

Prefect

----------

Esteemed
Mr. ARGĂœELLO Kiko, Ms. HERNANDEZ Carmen, Rev. Fr. PEZZI Mario
Via dei Gonzaga, 205
ROMA


__________


Dear brothers and sisters of the Neocatecumenal communities,

IN CONSCIENCE, BEFORE GOD, I CAN NO LONGER CELEBRATE A MASS NOT APPROVED BY THE CHURCH. In these last several years I have begun to understand more and more, in my meditations each day and before our Eucharistic Lord one hour everyday for the last 14 years, the greatness of the Eucharist, the substantial presence of Jesus, the Son of God, in Person, in every smallest particle of bread. I also began to discover and to understand how much the devil has worked, with great astuteness and subtleness, in the Catholic Church, to cause to diminish the faith, love and reverential humility before the infinite God in the Eucharist, “the source and summit of the Christian life”.” (Vat. II: LG 11; CCC 1324). A year ago I had written an article (in Italian): “Il Dio Infinito Fra Noi” (http://cibo-spir.blogspot.it/2014/01/il-dio-infinito-fra-noi.html).

I am always willing to help out with the penitential celebrations.

I would like to offer a proposal, my idea. Even though I am totally convinced that it is very important to obey this letter from Cardinal Arinze, in the letter of Kiko, Carmen and Father Mario, which they wrote to the Pope on January 17, 2006, they underlined that to do the communion “in this way” is an essential instrument to convert the ones further away from the faith: to abandon this would compromise their mission. The communities which are already on the way for more than 5 or 10 years, it seems to me that they are no longer “the ones further away from the faith”. And thus if a few of the communities are willing to obey the letter of Cardinal Arinze, in agreement with their Pastor (where they are accommodated) and with their catechists, I am very willing to celebrate the Holy Mass in the way approved by Holy Mother Church with you.

In the Beginning of the Year Convivience 2013-2014, Kiko said at the end of the ecclesial catechesis: “It is a very important the point of the catechism on politics, it is a very important point. There are those who think that history is immanent, that we are going toward a better world, with more democracy, more progress, and we can say that this is false! We are going toward the apostasy, toward the antichrist, as the Book of Revelation and the Catechism say.”

I believe in this very difficult period, with less prayer than ever and more sin and more indifference than ever, “Satan disguises himself as an angel of light” (2Cor 11:14) better than ever. And thus, it is very important to remain faithful to the Magisterium of the Church. The Church is the handmaid of the Truth, not the Author of the Truth! “Who Decides The Truth?” (http://spir-food.blogspot.it/2014/06/who-decides-truth.html). “The work of the devil will infiltrate even the Church in such a way that one will see CARDINALS OPPOSING CARDINALS, bishops against other bishops. … the Church will be full of those who accept compromise …” (Our Lady of Akita, Japan; October 13, 1973, the anniversary of the great miracle of the sun at Fatima, October 13, 1917)!

In the “Act of Consecration to the Immaculate Heart of Mary” for the associated priests of the Marian Movement for Priests, one reads: “Above all, we wish to be united with the Holy Father and the hierarchy, firmly adhering to all their directives, so as thus to set up a barrier to the growing confrontation directed against the Magisterium, that threatens the very foundation of the Church.”

Dear brothers and sisters, let us help each other (Heb 3:13) to not gently slide (“full of joy”, Diary of St. Faustina, no. 153) into apostasy, with compromises, before “the man of lawlessness is revealed, the son of perdition” (2Thess 2:3-4)!

Father Joseph Dwight

- - - - - - -

An Experience of Life:

It was night. Suddenly someone opened the door forcefully: "Everybody on the floor", they shouted. They were bandits. They grabbed Marie-Francis, my little sister, they forced her into the closet. They searched all over, they took jackets, the radio, dad’s backpack... They did not find money because we were poor. Then they pulled out of the closet Marie-Francis and one of them with a large knife in his hand, threatened: "Either you give us the money, or ...". I got up. Jesus gave me courage. Precisely that very day we set out to see Jesus and love Him in everyone. I looked at the man straight in the eye and said, "You cannot do this! I know it, in you there is Jesus. I see Jesus in you." The gunman looked at me with his mouth open, then he put down my little sister. He nodded to his partner and they left without taking anything away. They even left the little cash they had taken from the purse of the mother.

John, Camerun


- - - - - - -

Father Joseph Dwight



Sunday, November 10, 2013

Ephesians 4:32

Be kind to one another, tender-hearted, forgiving one another, as God in Christ forgave you (Eph 4:32).

The experience of God's forgiveness is what can change us from the inside, because it makes us experience the generosity of His mercy and an inexhaustible possibility of life . In the first place is not our possible conversion, but the joy of forgiveness, joy above all of God in offering us His forgiveness . Jesus in the reception of sinners gives us a glimpse this joy. The three parables that make up the fifteenth chapter of the Gospel of Luke (15:1-32) clearly convey the good news: God is a good father, his home is a safe space . The focus of the three stories focuses on the joy of God for change.

In the parable of the lost sheep attention is drawn to the activities of the pastor who searches: he leaves, goes behind, until it finds. And precisely to the intensity of the search is connected the joy of finding again. God rejoices in forgiveness. The parable tells us what God feels, not what the sinner must do. The sympathy of God and his love for the sinner precede the conversion. We convert because we are loved . We convert because we are forgiven. The shepherd goes in search of the lost sheep because it continues to be precious in his eyes. How beautiful it is to celebrate the sacrament of reconciliation: it makes you experience the joy of God which becomes your strength.

- - - - - - -

Un’Esperienza di Vita:

As I walked with my load of "lollipops" I noticed a crowd of people around a boy: he had stolen and sold a pack of cigarettes in order to eat something.

When things like this happen here with us the police are not called, but they beat you badly right on the spot.

How to get off the hook that guy who was not such a villain like they wanted to make it appear? From my proceeds of the day I took the money and I paid for him. And so calm returned and I was able to warn the boy. After a few days I passed by that area again: a person recognized me and stopped me, remembering the episode of the cigarettes; he thanked me for the example I had given.

K.Y. - Camerun

- - - - - - -

P.s.
Perhaps you will find interesting these three documents which I published on my blogs:
 
The Masonic Plan For The Destruction Of The Catholic Church

- - - - - - -

The “Prophecy” of Saint Francis (Assisi)

- - - - - - -

Prophecies of Blessed Anne-Catherine Emmerick



Saturday, April 6, 2013

James 5:9




“Do not grumble, brethren, against one another” (Jas 5:9).


The Lord is near: it is the message that comes to us in this passage from the letter of Saint James. Certainly, looking at what is around us, it would not seem real: how much violence, injustice and oppression!

The Apostle James invites the Christians of his time, who lived in difficulties, to patience and to rejuvenate the mind and he proposes as an example and stimulus the figures of the farmer and the prophet. The first waits patiently for the autumn and the spring rains. His job depends on them and cannot do anything without them. The Palestinian farmer was so open to this action of God that the blessings or rain became proverbial... just as his patience became proverbial. The exhortation to patience has as its center the need to avoid grumbling and protests in order to live the precept of mutual love. The other example that St. James presents to his readers is that of the prophets who bear pain, persecution and, sometimes, death. They accept patiently everything because they understood that "the Lord's coming is near."

How can we accept and make our own this message? It invites us to understand, in the folds of history, the positive, the good, the seeds of the Word, that is, the signs of Christ's presence. There is the good: let us appreciate it and make it grow. This reassures us, it gives us courage, it put in this way a ray of light, which is the light of God in our hearts. It communicates to us new energy and the heart becomes capable of being like that of God, always ready to love.

Christians are not those who complain, but they know how to bring the light that they have in the heart in the environments where they live: in the family, at work, in times of leisure and rest, with friends. They are a positive presence, because the Lord is near. And with Him one can not be down. Like the disciples of Emmaus: "Did not our hearts burn within us while He talked to us on the road, while He opened to us the scriptures?” (Lk 24:32).

But sometimes, out of true love, we must speak as Jesus spoke to the disciples of Emmaus: “O foolish men, and slow of heart to believe all that the prophets have spoken! Was it not necessary that the Christ should suffer these things and enter into His glory? (Lk 24:25-26).

- - - - - - -

An Experience of Life:

At a bar here in Italy, which also sells magazines, where I live and go for a cup of coffee after my daily Mass, one of the wives (co-owner of the bar; two family owners), was talking about the calendar, which they sell, with a completely nude woman on the front. I said to her that she will have to render an account to God after her death for selling pornography in her store. She was not happy with me and became frustrated. I then said to her that we men, as God has created us, when we habitually look at pornography without repenting and seeking to amend our lives, begin to look upon women as objects of pleasure instead of persons to appreciate and to esteem. She said with indignation: “But who says this?” I answered, Pope Paul VI in Humanae Vitae! I then said to her that when husbands, who are habituated to looking at pornography, make love with their wives, they are making love with the image of the pornography in their head, not with their wives, which is a true betrayal! Italians in general are very adept to making banal everything including the most sacred things of our faith.

When a girl uses her half naked body as bait, she attracts fish interested in her body; when that fish gets tired of her body, he goes to another body and she goes into depression and wonders why?!? If she covers her body modestly and uses the mystery of her personality which God gave her, she attracts men interested in her unique character which is unrepeatable and thus this attraction will last a lifetime, with the help of prayer, and on into eternity! This is not easy when the vast majority of the male fish have truly become intoxicated, even to the point of modifying their brains, with pornography and thus are brainwashed and highly stimulated to seek what they see in the pornographic magazines, the perfect bodies which do not exist. Girls end up trying to compete with the perfectly disguised, camouflaged and fixed-up models and end up doing extreme diets and all kinds of other body-shaping exercises.

In the name of “women’s liberation” women have been truly debased and have forfeited their God-given dignity to be valued according to their fat tissue and flesh in the right places of their bodies (like cattle auctioning) because they have swallowed the continually repeated enticing slogans of the “father of lies” (Jn 8:44) who tells us that our worth is only in the visible and that God takes away our freedom and happiness. Only if women and men seek, find and embrace the Author and Giver of their intrinsic beauty and dignity can they escape from and come out of this hideous tunnel of deception to find true and lasting freedom, joy, peace and happiness. The first commandment of Satan is: “You must not suffer; avoid suffering at all costs!” While the Author of life tells us: “If any man would come after me, let him deny himself and take up his cross and follow me” (Mt 16:24; Mk 8:34; 10:21; Lk 9:23). There is no Easter without Good Friday; there is no resurrection without the passion and the crucifixion in our personal lives in union with the One Who loves us more than all the love of others put together, Jesus Christ! Did the owners of this bar care about discovering the connection between pornography and the damage or the destruction to people, families and society? “Ignorance is bliss”, at least for ones own egotism, without any concern for the others unless we get caught and then only to save face! Hypocrites! Is “ignorance bliss” for eternity, or is Jesus right when He said: “The truth shall set you free” (Jn 8:32)? “Today, I was led by an Angel to the chasms of hell… But I noticed one thing: that most of the souls there are those who disbelieved that there is a hell.” (Diary of Saint Faustina, 741).

Our culture of death has not helped our boys to become true men who respect women but rather pathetic cowards masquerading as “Rambo” seeking only to use women for their egotistical pleasure, instead of sacrificing themselves for the true good of others as true men do! It is very difficult today both for the girl and for the boy to go against the very strongly promoted tide, a true deluge, of egotism of using each other for mutual masturbation which leads, in the end, to eliminating the weak who do not satisfy the self-centered desires and lustful pleasures of the strong. In the richer countries of the world we are truly living in the “culture of death” (Evangelium Vitae, by Pope John Paul II)!

A week later after this incident at the bar, the husband of this woman put a poster (about 36x24 inches) of a fully naked woman outside at the entrance of his bar in public view. When I protested he justified himself with an attitude of arrogance and laughing at me saying that God made women beautiful so why not look at them? He then pulled out another copy of what he posted outside his bar to show it to me close up inside the bar. I said that according to his logic men then should look at beautiful naked women and then leave their wives and break up the family and leave the children abandoned! He continued to joke and laugh at me. I am even more sad that the Pastor of the parish, who was present, just smiled and laughed at the inappropriate jokes so as to be in agreement with everyone as his way of treating others in a nice way and not being in disagreement with anyone! This Pastor is very generous and kind but it seems to me that his definition of “love” is to try to offer what the people want so that the people are all happy; when there is a conflict of interests between what he thinks the people want and what one reads in the Bible as explained by the Catechism of the Catholic Church, he ignores or pushes aside what the people do not want to hear.

It seems to me that in this situation one could apply the words of Christ: “Get behind me, Satan! You are a hindrance to me; for you are not on the side of God, but of men.” (Mt 16:23).

Love, for the enemy, is the last frontier of a boundless mercy. To love in this way makes us similar to God, it realizes the image of the heavenly man.

But we must remember what Saint Thomas Aquinas wrote: “Rarely affirm, seldom deny, always distinguish.” Today in many countries of the world, the governments are pushing forward very strongly laws against “homophobia” even though this manipulation is against the will of the majority of the citizens of these countries. This word “homophobia” did not even exist a few years ago! Jesus taught us to love the sinner but hate the sin. But the non-believers, or “believers” who do not practice their faith, who are in the great majority today, do not distinguish between the sinner and the sin, and so, they accuse the true Christians of hating the people who have the tendency of homosexuality. Very soon there will be a true and open persecution against all those who express openly, even in the churches, that it is a grave sin, the act of homosexuality, which hurts not only the person who commits this immoral act, but also it greatly harms the families and the society. How quickly we forget what happened to Sodom and Gomorrah (Gen 19)!

True love of the enemy means to desire the true good of the enemy here on earth but also for all eternity. So many people today, also a great number of religious leaders and parents, seek to please and satisfy the desires of the flesh of the people without distinguishing if it is a sin or not, if it truly does good to the person or not. This is false and destructive love; this is misguided compassion! Few religious leaders today have the courage of the first Pope, Peter, the day of the birth of the Church, Pentecost, to say: “You have crucified Jesus” (Acts 4:10), “the author of life” (Acts 3:16), with your grave, mortal sins!

Jesus said to the apostles: “Behold, I send you out as sheep in the midst of wolves; so be wise as serpents and innocent as doves” (Mt 10:16). Our Lady continually asks us to pray for the priests, the bishops and the Pope, because there is a great temptation today, with so many people brainwashed by the mass media, the schools and almost all of the religious institutions, almost all under the control of the forces of evil, to accept this false and devastating “love”. Thus it is much easier, in the name of “love” (false), to live the easier part of the words of Jesus, to be “innocent as doves”: “Ignorance is bliss!” It is difficult to go against the current today, to seek the Truth with difficulty, with study and with assiduous prayer, in order to also be “wise as serpents”!

One of the acts of charity most important especially today and which is gravely lacking today, especially by priests, bishops and parents, is to make known, to make hated and to overcome sin. But a very great number of leaders have sacrifices eternity on the altar of human respect precisely because a great number of “Christians” do not want to know, to hate and to overcome their sins that they have allowed themselves to become habituated to!

It is true that we priests studied in pastoral theology “the need to apply the “law of graduality”. But what I find is that the recent popes, in the world today, put us on our guard not so much about the lack of applying the “LAW OF GRADUALITY” but rather the danger of the “GRADUALITY OF THE LAW”, which must be refuted in as much as it reduces the value of the law to a mere ideal.” (Visit: “An Open Letter To A Fellow Priest”; http://testimony-polo.blogspot.com/2009/11/open-letter-to-fellow-priest.html).

“When the disciples heard this they were greatly astonished saying, “Who then can be saved?” But Jesus looked at them and said to them, “With men this is impossible, but with God all things are possible”. (Mt 19:25-26; Mk 10:27; Lk 18:27). Jesus did not offer compromises!

When the Jews disputed saying: “How can this man give us his flesh to eat” (Jn 6:52), and then “many of his disciples drew back and no longer went about with him. Jesus said to the twelve, Will you also go away?” (Jn 6:66-67). Jesus did not compromise the Truth to accommodate the people!

It is interesting what Our Lady said about these our times:
Each day recite the prayers of the Rosary. WITH THE ROSARY, PRAY FOR THE POPE, THE BISHOPS, AND THE PRIESTS. The work of the devil will infiltrate even the Church in such a way that one will see cardinals opposing cardinals, bishops against other bishops. The priests who venerate Me will be scorned and opposed by their conferees… churches and altars sacked, THE CHURCH WILL BE FULL OF THOSE WHO ACCEPT COMPROMISE …” (http://www.miraclerosarymission.org/akita.htm).

If the majority of the local priests indicate, in one way or another, that one can get to heaven without passing through Calvary with Jesus, who will believe the one priest in the area that explains that this is contrary to the constant teaching of the Catholic Church and all of the saints? If parents are not united, a child will take the words of the parent who offers the easiest path. This is false love, this is false compassion, which does not lead to true freedom (Jn 8:32) but true slavery and destruction!

It is true that a pastor should seek to help and comfort those who are suffering; Christ had great compassion for the suffering. But when one discerns that it is the will of God to accept and embrace the gift of a small piece of the cross of Christ, the pastor should encourage the people to hold fast to the true teachings of Christ and not push aside the more difficult teachings of Sacred Scripture explained by the Church. The Curate of Ars said a priest must be ready to suffer with and for every penitent who come to him in confession, even though the holy Curate encouraged people to embrace with love and trust the sufferings that God sends to each of us in His loving divine providence. We must imitate Simon of Cyrene to carry with Jesus His cross, even though at times we feel compelled to do so (Mk 15:21).

“Now I rejoice in my sufferings for you sake, and in my flesh I complete what is lacking in Christ’s afflictions for the sake of his body, that is, the church” (Col 1:24).

This same seemingly meek and humble priest, who just about never raises his voice to anyone, reacted strongly to me when I praise a woman, Mary Ann Kuharski, with 12 children who I saw on EWTN and who is doing great work as the Director of Prolife across America; his reaction was as if this woman had done a grave wrong or was out of her mind! This same pastor, after I spoke of the importance of maintaining great reverence before the infinite God in the Eucharist during my homily at daily Mass in a church where he is the Pastor, citing a few things from Church documents such as Memoriale Domini (1969), again reacted strongly even to the point of just about yelling at me in the bar after Mass. When I asked him if it was wrong to cite the documents of the Church or writings of the popes, he responded forcefully, “Not in this case” (“In questo caso, No!”)! People do not like to suffer with more children than one or two which gives satisfaction to the parents, but no more. People do not like to maintain humility before the Blessed Sacrament and to persevere in not chattering in church with their friends. Many so-called experts of the liturgy after the Second Vatican Council ignored or discarded most of the wisdom of 2000 years of tradition and shifted the focus of the Liturgy toward the people and the community instead of maintaining the primary focus on the adoration of God and communion with God in the Sacred Liturgy. This was rather appealing to a great number of priests and bishops who are now very reluctant in accepting the reform of the reform of the Sacred Liturgy begun by Pope Benedict XVI.

I have discovered that this priest talks to others about my behavior in this situation as if I am rather strange, like I am from another world. It seems that there are many Catholics today, who I have met, that are very similar to our Protestant brothers because they are comfortable with the Bible but not with the Catechism of the Catholic Church. It occurred to me that it is much easier to interpret the Sacred Scriptures according to ones own desires and subjectivism and whims than the official Catechism of the Catholic Church! In other words it is much easier to manipulate according to ones own whims and desires 10 briefly stated commandments from chapter 5 of the book of Deuteronomy than 505 paragraphs (CCC 2052-2557) from the official Catechism of the Catholic Church (1994)!

This less problematic way of accommodating what the people desire is what so many priests and bishops do to be “politically correct”, to not make waves even though Christ always proclaimed the full truth, the full Gospel, which led to His crucifixion! After I saw the poster still outside the bar the next morning I said in my homily that morning that I decided to make a Christmas Novena in which I would not take coffee (“cappuccino”) after Mass each morning, with the intention of making reparation for all of the sins caused by pornography. But after Christmas I continued to not go to this bar. When I saw the same wife on the street a few days later she made fun of me asking me if I was afraid of naked women! I said that my Jesus suffers due to pornography. She retorted back: “But what suffering, what suffering?” (“Ma che soffrire, ma che soffrire?!?”).

Is it not in our egotistical times, in the “culture of death” (Evangelium Vitae), that we hear shouted and promoted in the mass media the prophecy of Jesus (the eighth “Station of the Cross”): “For behold, the days are coming when they will say, ‘Blessed are the barren, and the wombs that never bore, and the breast that never gave suck!’ Then they will begin to say to the mountains, ‘Fall on us’; and to the hills, ‘Cover us.’ (“The survivors will find themselves so desolate that they will envy the dead.” - Akita). For if they do this when the wood is green (when all is easy in wellbeing and richness; no sacrifice in giving life, procreation (Gen 1:28), as God did in creating us!), what will happen when it is dry?” (Lk 23:29-31). In the past this prophecy was often applied to the women of Jerusalem and to those like them in future times, those who have compassion for Jesus in His great sufferings for us. The truthful economists, who do not promote the culture of death, tell us that one of the most fundamental factors causing the current economic crisis is that for the first time in the history of the world and of the Church in the richer countries there are more grandparents than children who must sustain the pensions of those in retirement.

A week after Christmas the identical twin sacristans, who like chattering with their buddies at the bar about sport events (Juventus fans) and who were happy with my friendly and outgoing presence at this bar in the past, grumbled to me that I should return to this bar and make peace. I said to them that this would be like making peace 2000 years ago with the soldiers who were joking and laughing at Jesus on the cross and offered Jesus vinegar. Those who joke and laugh about this “grave offense” of selling and distributing pornographic materials are doing the same as the soldiers 2000 years ago who crucified Jesus! I added that I will return to this bar if they stop selling pornography. They murmured to me: “This would be difficult!” (“Questa sarĂ  difficile!”). My personal choice to seek to discover and do what Jesus wants in this situation was a suffering for me to not have a cup of cappuccino with friends each morning after my daily Mass!

When I saw this same wife (co-owner of the bar) at a social lunch a few weeks later, she said to me that if I talk about this anymore to others she was going to come into the church while I was celebrating Mass and do something. I told her to bring her gun and shoot me!

A few months later when I saw one of the other wives (co-owner of the bar; two families), who was more sympathetic toward me (her mother went to Holy Mass everyday), at the weekly street market, she asked me why I do not come to the bar anymore. I said to her that if she stops selling pornography in her bar I will come back immediately. Her facial expression revealed that she was rather bewildered, that she was not able to understand my motivation for my behavior! As so many so-called Christians today, totally immersed in the grave and devastating deception of relativism which surrounds us today like the air that we breath in which there is no more objective and absolute truth, it did not even enter into her mind to seek or to ask the question: what are the effects on others caused by selling pornography for a few coins, or what does Jesus want or desire in this situation, or in this situation what would give delight to Jesus Who gave us everything we have and even died on the cross due to our indifference and ingratitude?

When people ask me why I do not frequent that bar anymore, I give them the following printed on a small piece of paper:
Side 1:
Catechism of the Catholic Church:
2354 “PORNOGRAPHY consists in removing real or simulated sexual acts from the intimacy of the partners, in order to display them deliberately to third parties. It offends against chastity because it perverts the conjugal act, the intimate giving of spouses to each other. It does grave injury to the dignity of its participants (actors, vendors, the public), since each one becomes an object of base pleasure and illicit profit for others. It immerses all who are involved in the illusion of a fantasy world. It is a grave offense. Civil authorities should prevent the production and distribution of pornographic materials.”
Side 2:
Relativism, according to Pope Benedict XVI, is "the most profound difficulty of our time." (http://popebenedictxviblog.blogspot.it/2005_05_01_archive.html).
In his homily at the Mass preceding the conclave that quickly elected him Pope Benedict XVI, then Cardinal Ratzinger said: “Today, having a clear faith based on the Creed of the Church is often labeled as fundamentalism. Whereas relativism, that is, letting oneself be "tossed here and there, carried about by every wind of doctrine", seems the only attitude that can cope with modern times. WE ARE BUILDING A DICTATORSHIP OF RELATIVISM that does not recognize anything as definitive and whose ultimate goal consists solely of one's own ego and desires.” (http://www.vatican.va/gpII/documents/homily-pro-eligendo-pontifice_20050418_en.html).

When I offered this written copy, while walking on the street near the post office, of the explanation of why I do not frequent that bar anymore to the bar owner who had posted the naked woman outside his bar, he just smiled and joke at me as if I was some type of idiot. But more than four months after the incident, when I walked past his bar while he was sitting outside with someone else, I said good morning to them and wished then a nice day and the owner of the bar did not even lift his head to respond to me. When a major crisis begins in Italy and the mass media puts the blame on the true Christians, what will be the reaction of this man toward me then? “I have said all this to you to keep you from falling away. They will put you out of the synagogues; indeed, the hour is coming when whoever kills you will think he is offering service to God. And they will do this because they have not known the Father, no me. But I have said these things to you, that when their hour comes you may remember that I told you of them” (Jn 16:1-4).

From a website in Italian one finds the following in regards to MASONRY AND SEXUAL CORRUPTION:
2) “Our job is to PROMOTE A WAVE OF PORNOGRAPHY and to present it with sympathy as the supreme goal of artistic freedom” (Word of order of the Italian Communist Party).
3) “If we want to destroy a nation, WE MUST FIRST DESTROY IT’S MORALS; then it will fall in our laps as a ripe fruit. Awaken the interest of the youth for sex and it will be yours” (Lenin).
To conquer America, Khrushchev had sent into America a great quantity of pornography. In an interview with the Sec. of Agriculture, Esra Taft Benson during the Eisenhower administration, KHRUSHCHEV said, “You Americans are so gullible. No, you won’t accept communism outright; but we’ll keep feeding you small doses of Socialism until you will finally wake up and find that you already have communism. We won’t have to fight you; we will so weaken your economy UNTIL YOU FALL LIKE OVERRIPE FRUIT INTO OUR HANDS.”

"Religion does not fear the dagger’s point; but it can vanish under corruption. Let us not grow tired of corruption: we may use a pretext, such as sport, hygiene, health resorts. It is necessary to corrupt, that our boys and girls practice nudism in dress. To avoid too much reaction, one would have to progress in a methodical manner: first, undress up to the elbow; then up to the knees; then arms and legs completely uncovered; later, the upper part of the chest, the shoulders, etc. etc." (International Review on Freemasonry, 1928)


Don Jo (Joseph) Dwight (Italy)